Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-5.6 Sol vs Grok 4.6

Compare Claude Fable 5.1 from Anthropic, GPT-5.6 Sol from OpenAI, and Grok 4.6 from SpaceXAI on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access all 3 models and hundreds of others through the OpenRouter API.

Favicon for anthropic
Claude Fable 5.1
Favicon for openai
GPT-5.6 Sol
Favicon for x-ai
Grok 4.6

Overview

Claude Fable 5.1
Author
Anthropic
GPT-5.6 Sol
Author
OpenAI
Grok 4.6
Author
SpaceXAI
Claude Fable 5.1
Context length
1Mtokens
GPT-5.6 Sol
Context length
1.05Mtokens
Grok 4.6
Context length
500Ktokens
Claude Fable 5.1
Reasoning
GPT-5.6 Sol
Reasoning
Grok 4.6
Reasoning
Claude Fable 5.1
Input modalities
GPT-5.6 Sol
Input modalities
Grok 4.6
Input modalities
Claude Fable 5.1
Output modalities
GPT-5.6 Sol
Output modalities
Grok 4.6
Output modalities

Analysis

Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-5.6 Sol vs Grok 4.6: side-by-side summary

Claude Fable 5.1, GPT-5.6 Sol, and Grok 4.6 are available through the OpenRouter API, so switching between them takes a model slug change rather than a new integration.

Claude Fable 5.1, from Anthropic, has a 1,000,000-token context window and is priced at $10/M tokens input, $50/M tokens output on OpenRouter.

GPT-5.6 Sol, from OpenAI, has a 1,050,000-token context window and is priced at $4/M tokens input, $20/M tokens output on OpenRouter.

Grok 4.6, from SpaceXAI, has a 500,000-token context window and is priced at $2/M tokens input, $6/M tokens output on OpenRouter.

Claude Fable 5.1
Context window
1,000,000 tokens
GPT-5.6 Sol
Context window
1,050,000 tokens
Grok 4.6
Context window
500,000 tokens
Claude Fable 5.1
Price
$10/M tokens input, $50/M tokens output
GPT-5.6 Sol
Price
$4/M tokens input, $20/M tokens output
Grok 4.6
Price
$2/M tokens input, $6/M tokens output
Claude Fable 5.1
Provided by
Anthropic
GPT-5.6 Sol
Provided by
OpenAI
Grok 4.6
Provided by
SpaceXAI