GPT-5.6 Luna is a fast, cost-efficient model in OpenAI's GPT-5.6 series. It is suited for high-volume, latency-sensitive tasks such as chat, classification, and lightweight agentic workflows, providing capable reasoning for its price tier.
Providers
Different companies host the same model. OpenRouter routes your request to one of them based on the routing mode you pick: Balanced (price + speed), Nitro (fastest), or Floor (cheapest).
| $0.20 | $1.20 | $0.020 | 1.37s | 114 tok/s | ||
| $0.20 | $1.20 | $0.020 | 1.67s | 62 tok/s | ||
| $0.20 | $1.20 | $0.020 | 3.48s | 72 tok/s | ||
Not used in Standard routing:Why these endpoints are not used | ||||||
Flex | $0.10 | $0.60 | $0.010 | 2.20s | 82 tok/s | |
| $0.22 | $1.32 | $0.022 | 1.23s | 83 tok/s | ||
| $0.22 | $1.32 | $0.022 | 0.37s | 158 tok/s | ||
| $0.22 | $1.32 | $0.022 | 1.36s | 107 tok/s | ||
Fast | $0.40 | $2.40 | $0.040 | 0.86s | 89 tok/s | |
- Input $0.20 / Output $1.20114 tok/s100.00% uptime
- Input $0.20 / Output $1.2062 tok/s100.00% uptime
- Input $0.20 / Output $1.2072 tok/s97.70% uptime
- Not used in Standard routing:Why these endpoints are not used
- Input $0.10 / Output $0.6082 tok/s99.97% uptimeFlex
- Input $0.22 / Output $1.3283 tok/s100.00% uptime
- Input $0.22 / Output $1.32158 tok/s98.45% uptime
- Input $0.22 / Output $1.32107 tok/s100.00% uptime
- Input $0.40 / Output $2.4089 tok/s100.00% uptimeFast
Pricing
The average price customers actually pay for this model, next to the prices providers post. Caching and discounts mean the price actually paid is often well below the listed one.
Weighted average
GPT-5.6 Luna — Price history
| $0.0470 | $1.201 | 89.6% | 18.6% | ||
| $0.1386 | $1.199 | 48.4% | 75.8% | ||
| $0.2119 | $1.199 | 16.5% | 2.4% | ||
Not used in Standard routing:Why these endpoints are not used | |||||
Flex | $0.0533 | $0.599 | 58.7% | 1.2% | |
| $0.1373 | $1.319 | 54.2% | 0.1% | ||
| $0.1451 | $1.319 | 50.7% | 1.5% | ||
Fast | $0.1767 | $2.399 | 69.8% | 0.1% | |
| $0.1783 | $1.318 | 37.5% | 0.3% | ||
- Effective in $0.0470 / Effective out $1.201Token share18.6%
- Effective in $0.1386 / Effective out $1.199Token share75.8%
- Effective in $0.2119 / Effective out $1.199Token share2.4%
- Not used in Standard routing:Why these endpoints are not used
- Effective in $0.0533 / Effective out $0.599FlexToken share1.2%
- Effective in $0.1373 / Effective out $1.319Token share0.1%
- Effective in $0.1451 / Effective out $1.319Token share1.5%
- Effective in $0.1767 / Effective out $2.399FastToken share0.1%
- Effective in $0.1783 / Effective out $1.318Token share0.3%
Performance
Throughput is how fast the model writes (tokens per second — higher is better). Latency is total round-trip time (lower is better). TTFT is time-to-first-token — how long before you see anything appear (lower is better).
P50, best across providers
P50, best provider
Uptime
Uptime is the percentage of the past 3 days that at least one provider was responding to requests. Availability is the percentage of time that inference was successfully served. OpenRouter continuously monitors and uses the next-best provider when one returns an error.
Availability over the last 3 days
Last 72 hoursAvailability over the last 24 hours
When an error occurs in an upstream provider, we can recover by routing to another healthy provider, if your request filters allow it. You can access per-provider uptime data programmatically through the Endpoints API. Learn more about our load balancing and provider routing options.
Benchmarks
Scores on standardized evaluations and this model’s own outputs on shared benchmark prompts. Higher percentages are better — and each rank shows where this model lands among the models evaluated on that source.
| Source | Benchmark | Score |
|---|---|---|
| Artificial Analysis | GPT-5.6 Luna (Max) Intelligence Index | 23.8 |
| Artificial Analysis | GPT-5.6 Luna (Max) Coding Index | 71.4 |
| Artificial Analysis | GPT-5.6 Luna (Max) Agentic Index | 42.1 |
| Artificial Analysis | GPT-5.6 Luna (Max) GPQA Diamond | 91.1% |
| Artificial Analysis | GPT-5.6 Luna (Max) HLE | 39.5% |
| Artificial Analysis | GPT-5.6 Luna (Max) AA-LCR | 83.7% |
| Artificial Analysis | GPT-5.6 Luna (Max) τ-Bench Banking | 31.1% |
| Artificial Analysis | GPT-5.6 Luna (Max) GDPval-AA | 48.4% |
| Artificial Analysis | GPT-5.6 Luna (Max) CritPt | 20.6% |
| Artificial Analysis | GPT-5.6 Luna (Max) SciCode | 53.6% |
| Artificial Analysis | GPT-5.6 Luna (Max) Terminal-Bench 4.0 | 11.6% |
| Artificial Analysis | GPT-5.6 Luna (Max) Terminal-Bench 2.1 | 80.9% |
| Artificial Analysis | GPT-5.6 Luna (Max) AA-Omniscience Accuracy | 39.1% |
| Artificial Analysis | GPT-5.6 Luna (Max) AA-Omniscience Non-Hallucination Rate | 7.7% |
| Artificial Analysis | GPT-5.6 Luna (Low) Coding Index | 44.2 |
| Artificial Analysis | GPT-5.6 Luna (Low) Agentic Index | 16.1 |
| Artificial Analysis | GPT-5.6 Luna (Low) GPQA Diamond | 83.5% |
| Artificial Analysis | GPT-5.6 Luna (Low) HLE | 19.8% |
| Artificial Analysis | GPT-5.6 Luna (Low) AA-LCR | 70.0% |
| Artificial Analysis | GPT-5.6 Luna (Low) τ-Bench Banking | 12.8% |
| Artificial Analysis | GPT-5.6 Luna (Low) GDPval-AA | 25.1% |
| Artificial Analysis | GPT-5.6 Luna (Low) CritPt | 2.6% |
| Artificial Analysis | GPT-5.6 Luna (Low) SciCode | 46.1% |
| Artificial Analysis | GPT-5.6 Luna (Low) Terminal-Bench 4.0 | 0.0% |
| Artificial Analysis | GPT-5.6 Luna (Low) Terminal-Bench 2.1 | 43.4% |
| Artificial Analysis | GPT-5.6 Luna (Xhigh) Coding Index | 68.6 |
| Artificial Analysis | GPT-5.6 Luna (Xhigh) Agentic Index | 38.7 |
| Artificial Analysis | GPT-5.6 Luna (Xhigh) GPQA Diamond | 89.5% |
| Artificial Analysis | GPT-5.6 Luna (Xhigh) HLE | 37.0% |
| Artificial Analysis | GPT-5.6 Luna (Xhigh) AA-LCR | 81.7% |
| Artificial Analysis | GPT-5.6 Luna (Xhigh) τ-Bench Banking | 28.7% |
| Artificial Analysis | GPT-5.6 Luna (Xhigh) GDPval-AA | 45.4% |
| Artificial Analysis | GPT-5.6 Luna (Xhigh) CritPt | 20.6% |
| Artificial Analysis | GPT-5.6 Luna (Xhigh) SciCode | 50.5% |
| Artificial Analysis | GPT-5.6 Luna (Xhigh) Terminal-Bench 4.0 | 3.5% |
| Artificial Analysis | GPT-5.6 Luna (Xhigh) Terminal-Bench 2.1 | 77.9% |
| Artificial Analysis | GPT-5.6 Luna (Medium) Coding Index | 50.7 |
| Artificial Analysis | GPT-5.6 Luna (Medium) Agentic Index | 23.9 |
| Artificial Analysis | GPT-5.6 Luna (Medium) GPQA Diamond | 85.9% |
| Artificial Analysis | GPT-5.6 Luna (Medium) HLE | 25.8% |
| Artificial Analysis | GPT-5.6 Luna (Medium) AA-LCR | 75.0% |
| Artificial Analysis | GPT-5.6 Luna (Medium) τ-Bench Banking | 17.7% |
| Artificial Analysis | GPT-5.6 Luna (Medium) GDPval-AA | 31.9% |
| Artificial Analysis | GPT-5.6 Luna (Medium) CritPt | 4.9% |
| Artificial Analysis | GPT-5.6 Luna (Medium) SciCode | 46.8% |
| Artificial Analysis | GPT-5.6 Luna (Medium) Terminal-Bench 4.0 | 0.5% |
| Artificial Analysis | GPT-5.6 Luna (Medium) Terminal-Bench 2.1 | 53.2% |
| Artificial Analysis | GPT-5.6 Luna (Non-reasoning) Coding Index | 39.3 |
| Artificial Analysis | GPT-5.6 Luna (Non-reasoning) Agentic Index | 13.4 |
| Artificial Analysis | GPT-5.6 Luna (Non-reasoning) GPQA Diamond | 64.5% |
| Artificial Analysis | GPT-5.6 Luna (Non-reasoning) HLE | 7.2% |
| Artificial Analysis | GPT-5.6 Luna (Non-reasoning) AA-LCR | 42.7% |
| Artificial Analysis | GPT-5.6 Luna (Non-reasoning) τ-Bench Banking | 9.7% |
| Artificial Analysis | GPT-5.6 Luna (Non-reasoning) GDPval-AA | 21.4% |
| Artificial Analysis | GPT-5.6 Luna (Non-reasoning) CritPt | 0.3% |
| Artificial Analysis | GPT-5.6 Luna (Non-reasoning) SciCode | 40.4% |
| Artificial Analysis | GPT-5.6 Luna (Non-reasoning) Terminal-Bench 4.0 | 1.0% |
| Artificial Analysis | GPT-5.6 Luna (Non-reasoning) Terminal-Bench 2.1 | 39.0% |
| Artificial Analysis | GPT-5.6 Luna (High) Coding Index | 63.3 |
| Artificial Analysis | GPT-5.6 Luna (High) Agentic Index | 34.6 |
| Artificial Analysis | GPT-5.6 Luna (High) GPQA Diamond | 89.2% |
| Artificial Analysis | GPT-5.6 Luna (High) HLE | 33.4% |
| Artificial Analysis | GPT-5.6 Luna (High) AA-LCR | 80.3% |
| Artificial Analysis | GPT-5.6 Luna (High) τ-Bench Banking | 25.2% |
| Artificial Analysis | GPT-5.6 Luna (High) GDPval-AA | 41.9% |
| Artificial Analysis | GPT-5.6 Luna (High) CritPt | 16.6% |
| Artificial Analysis | GPT-5.6 Luna (High) SciCode | 51.6% |
| Artificial Analysis | GPT-5.6 Luna (High) Terminal-Bench 4.0 | 2.5% |
| Artificial Analysis | GPT-5.6 Luna (High) Terminal-Bench 2.1 | 69.7% |
| Vals AI | GPT-5.6 Luna Access to Justice Benchmark | 65.6% |
| Vals AI | GPT-5.6 Luna BioMysteryBench | 61.5% |
| Vals AI | GPT-5.6 Luna Code Migration | 44.5% |
| Vals AI | GPT-5.6 Luna CorpFin v2 | 64.2% |
| Vals AI | GPT-5.6 Luna CyberBench v1.1 | 73.6% |
| Vals AI | GPT-5.6 Luna EMB | 67.1% |
| Vals AI | GPT-5.6 Luna Finance Agent (v2) | 55.0% |
| Vals AI | GPT-5.6 Luna Financial Coaching Bench | 69.3% |
| Vals AI | GPT-5.6 Luna GPQA Diamond | 91.7% |
| Vals AI | GPT-5.6 Luna Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark v1 | 1.3% |
| Vals AI | GPT-5.6 Luna IOI | 61.8% |
| Vals AI | GPT-5.6 Luna LegalBench | 84.0% |
| Vals AI | GPT-5.6 Luna Legal Research Bench | 36.5% |
| Vals AI | GPT-5.6 Luna MedCode | 42.4% |
| Vals AI | GPT-5.6 Luna MedScribe | 84.4% |
| Vals AI | GPT-5.6 Luna MMLU Pro | 86.0% |
| Vals AI | GPT-5.6 Luna MMMU Pro | 85.0% |
| Vals AI | GPT-5.6 Luna MortgageTax | 67.3% |
| Vals AI | GPT-5.6 Luna MysteryMechanism | 14.4% |
| Vals AI | GPT-5.6 Luna ProgramBench | 0.0% |
| Vals AI | GPT-5.6 Luna ProofBench v1.1 | 60.0% |
| Vals AI | GPT-5.6 Luna Public Benefits Bench v1.1 | 61.2% |
| Vals AI | GPT-5.6 Luna SAGE v1 | 44.2% |
| Vals AI | GPT-5.6 Luna Vals Science Index | 25.3% |
| Vals AI | GPT-5.6 Luna SkillsBench | 60.4% |
| Vals AI | GPT-5.6 Luna SRE Bench | 1.5% |
| Vals AI | GPT-5.6 Luna SWE-bench | 93.0% |
| Vals AI | GPT-5.6 Luna Tax Agent Bench | 24.8% |
| Vals AI | GPT-5.6 Luna TaxEval v2 | 76.2% |
| Vals AI | GPT-5.6 Luna Terminal-Bench 4.0 | 11.6% |
| Vals AI | GPT-5.6 Luna Terminal-Bench-Science | 0.0% |
| Vals AI | GPT-5.6 Luna Vals Index | 51.7% |
| Vals AI | GPT-5.6 Luna Vals Multimodal Index | 69.1% |
| Vals AI | GPT-5.6 Luna Vibe Code Bench 1-100 | 22.6% |
| Vals AI | GPT-5.6 Luna Vibe Code Bench v1.1 | 77.1% |
Apps
Public apps that send the most traffic to this model. Good signal for what real production workloads look like — and a hint at which use cases this model is best suited for.
Activity
Token volume and request traffic to this model over time.
API
Drop-in code to call this model. OpenRouter's API is OpenAI-compatible — most SDKs work by just swapping the base URL. The only thing that changes between models is the model slug below.
Available through EU in-region routing
OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna is available through EU in-region routing. Requests sent to eu.openrouter.ai are decrypted in the EU and routed only to shared provider endpoints in Europe (the EU/EEA, the UK, and Switzerland).
- Providers in Europe
- Azure
- Prices in Europe
- Azure: $0.22/M tokens input, $1.32/M tokens output
- Base URL
https://eu.openrouter.ai/api/v1- Plan
- Requires Business or Enterprise. Self-serve on Business: no contract, no monthly minimum. OpenRouter Business for EU in-region routing
Fails closed: if no shared provider endpoint in Europe is available, the request errors instead of leaving the region. Requests served by your own BYOK key go to your deployment’s region, which you control. In-region routing docs
Documentation
Guides, cookbooks, blog posts, and tools for building with OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna on OpenRouter.
Frequently asked questions
GPT-5.6 Luna is a fast, cost-efficient model in OpenAI's GPT-5.6 series. It is suited for high-volume, latency-sensitive tasks such as chat, classification, and lightweight agentic workflows, providing capable reasoning for its price tier.
The GPT-5.6 Luna documentation on OpenRouter includes the GPT-5.6 Migration Guide cookbook and the GPT 5.6 Discounts & Jevons Paradox blog post. The quickstart covers API keys and your first request, and the API reference lists every parameter.
GPT-5.6 Luna costs $0.20/M input tokens and $1.20/M output tokens, with separate rates for Cache Read at $0.02/M tokens and Cache Write at $0.25/M tokens.
GPT-5.6 Luna has a 1,050,000 token context window. It supports up to 128,000 completion tokens.
Yes. GPT-5.6 Luna accepts tools and tool_choice for function calling. It also supports structured outputs via a JSON schema in response_format.
Yes. OpenAI caches prompts of 1024 tokens or more automatically, and GPT-5.6 Luna bills a cache write on each cached prompt whether or not the cached prefix is read again. To turn caching off for a request, set prompt_cache_options.mode to "explicit" at the request root and do not mark any content block with prompt_cache_breakpoint. Explicit mode disables OpenAI-managed breakpoints, so a request with none of your own has no cacheable prefix and is billed at the plain input rate. See the prompt caching guide.
GPT-5.6 Luna accepts files such as PDFs, images, and text as input and returns text.
GPT-5.6 Luna is served by 3 providers on OpenRouter: OpenAI, Amazon Bedrock, and Azure. Requests are routed to the best available provider, with automatic failover to the others, and you can pin or exclude providers with provider routing.
GPT-5.6 Luna was released on July 9, 2026. Its knowledge cutoff is February 16, 2026.